Journal: EJNMMI Physics

Article Title: Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF)

doi: 10.1186/s40658-020-0270-y

Figure Lengend Snippet: Patient example. Coronar FDG-PET images of a patient are displayed for all nine reconstruction algorithms (details see the “Methods” section). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the liver is given. Notably, Q.Clear 150 , PSF+TOF 4/16 , OSEM+TOF 4/16 , and OSEM+TOF 2/17 exhibit unacceptably high noise (i.e., low SNR)

Article Snippet: OSEM+TOF reconstruction (GE VUE Point FX) was performed as OSEM+TOF 4/16 (4 iterations, 16 subsets, Gaussian in-plane filter of 2.0 mm), OSEM+TOF 2/17 (2 iterations, 17 subsets, 2.0 mm filter), and OSEM+TOF 2/8 (2 it, 8 ss; 6.4 mm).

Techniques:

Journal: EJNMMI Physics

Article Title: Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF)

doi: 10.1186/s40658-020-0270-y

Figure Lengend Snippet: Reconstructed spatial resolution

Article Snippet: OSEM+TOF reconstruction (GE VUE Point FX) was performed as OSEM+TOF 4/16 (4 iterations, 16 subsets, Gaussian in-plane filter of 2.0 mm), OSEM+TOF 2/17 (2 iterations, 17 subsets, 2.0 mm filter), and OSEM+TOF 2/8 (2 it, 8 ss; 6.4 mm).

Techniques:

Journal: EJNMMI Physics

Article Title: Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF)

doi: 10.1186/s40658-020-0270-y

Figure Lengend Snippet: SNR

Article Snippet: OSEM+TOF reconstruction (GE VUE Point FX) was performed as OSEM+TOF 4/16 (4 iterations, 16 subsets, Gaussian in-plane filter of 2.0 mm), OSEM+TOF 2/17 (2 iterations, 17 subsets, 2.0 mm filter), and OSEM+TOF 2/8 (2 it, 8 ss; 6.4 mm).

Techniques: